Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 2:49 on Carl Stevens and Casey Warwick.
The clock says 2:52 faster, but the races themselves got 5:41 quicker for everyone.
267 days between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:27 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:31 PB853/1159Beat 26%
-
Athens5 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men1:46:18 PB521/616Beat 15%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:10:22 PB967/2102Beat 54%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025, with Casey Warwick 2:27 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:09 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:36 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:27 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This pair0:09 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:10:31497/947Beat 48%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025, with Casey Warwick 0:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:43 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:05 faster for everyone, so 0:22 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:05 faster This pair2:43 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:14344/616Beat 44%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:34:29437/521Beat 16%