Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and London Olympia 2026, Claire Mcintosh lost 5:35 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:24 quicker, so 4:11 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
9 races · 8 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:29341/1159Beat 71%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:19:05205/844Beat 76%
-
Athens5 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:04125/367Beat 66%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:22 PB119/546Beat 78%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:19:2154/144Beat 63%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:28:54276/758Beat 64%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 5:35 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:35 behind the field: 4:11 slower on the clock, against 1:24 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 faster This athlete4:11 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:24:43 PB558/1542Beat 64%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:52212/673Beat 69%
↑ 146 days after London 2025, with Amrita Glazebrook 0:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:13 slower on the clock, and the race was 0:09 slower for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:09 slower This pair0:13 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:39 PB349/1118Beat 69%