Progress against the field
From Acapulco 2025 to Mexico City 2026, the field gained 7:37 on Uriel Pineda.
Over the same races everyone got 4:36 quicker, so 3:01 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
356 days between Mexico City 2025 and Mexico City 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 7:39 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 6 events
-
Mexico City29 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:1652/850Beat 94%
↑ 356 days after Mexico City 2025 7:39 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:15 slower on the clock in a race that was 5:24 faster for everyone: 7:39 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:24 faster This athlete2:15 slower -
Acapulco4 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:26:20 PB93/228Beat 59%
-
Puebla16 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:12:05 PB108/814Beat 87%
-
Guadalajara7 Feb 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:35 PB191/819Beat 77%
-
Mexico City7 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:36:47 PB92/102Beat 10%
-
Mexico City7 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:13:0113/582Beat 98%
↑ 62 days after Acapulco 2025 0:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 0:46 slower on the clock, against 0:48 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:48 slower This athlete0:46 slower -
Acapulco6 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:12:15 PB43/892Beat 95%