Progress against the field
From Mexico City 2025 to Acapulco 2026, the field gained 13:36 on XIMENA SERRANO NAVARRO and GRISELDA SERRANO NAVARRO.
Over the same races everyone got 10:34 quicker, so 3:02 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 190 days between Mexico City 2025 and Puebla 2026, cost 11:59 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Acapulco4 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:32:24462/863Beat 47%
↑ 111 days after Puebla 2026, with GRISELDA SERRANO NAVARRO 1:37 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:10 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 8:47 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:37 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →8:47 faster This pair7:10 faster -
Puebla16 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:39:34485/855Beat 43%
↑ 190 days after Mexico City 2025, with GRISELDA SERRANO NAVARRO 11:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:12 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:47 faster for everyone: 11:59 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:47 faster This pair10:12 slower -
Mexico City7 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:29:22 PB128/357Beat 64%
-
Acapulco6 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:29202/367Beat 45%