Progress against the field
From Maastricht 2025 to Maastricht 2026, the field gained 9:50 on Peter Spelde.
Over the same races everyone got 7:57 quicker, so 1:53 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men1:24:36533/1119Beat 52%
↑ 177 days after Mechelen 2026 4:57 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:44 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:47 slower for everyone: 4:57 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:47 slower This athlete6:44 slower -
Tenerife4 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Men1:10:00124/544Beat 77%
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:26 PB75/535Beat 86%
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:05:22112/674Beat 83%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:17:52 PB476/1363Beat 65%
↑ 118 days after Utrecht 2025 3:31 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:37 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:08 faster for everyone, so 3:31 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:08 faster This athlete2:37 faster -
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:29151/575Beat 74%
↑ 70 days after Maastricht 2025 1:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:36 faster for everyone, so 1:22 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:36 faster This athlete2:14 faster -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:22:43420/1352Beat 69%