Progress against the field
Between Brisbane 2026 and Perth 2026, Lucinda Pajewski lost 0:39 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:45 quicker, so 2:06 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Perth21 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:11 PB87/409Beat 79%
↑ 350 days after Perth 2025, with daniel Pajewski 11:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:00 better than the field: 13:54 faster on the clock, against 2:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:54 faster This pair13:54 faster -
Perth21 Aug 2026Individual Open · Women1:18:58 PB90/531Beat 83%
↑ 134 days after Brisbane 2026 0:39 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:06 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:45 faster for everyone, so 0:39 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:45 faster This athlete2:06 faster -
Brisbane9 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:21:0477/405Beat 81%
-
Perth5 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:23:0590/175Beat 49%
-
MelbourneDate unknownDoubles Open · Mixed1:12:12338/1343Beat 75%