Progress against the field
From Chengdu 2026 to Beijing 2026, 志博 胡 has moved with the field: what changed on the clock changed for everyone.
The clock says 1:50 faster, but the races themselves got 1:52 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Shenzhen 2026 → Beijing 2026: 2:28 in 26 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
23 races · 11 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men54:46 PB5/226Beat 98%
↑ 68 days after Hangzhou 2026, with 东昊 马 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 6:08 faster on the clock, against 6:08 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →6:08 faster This pair6:08 faster -
Beijing10 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:23 PB10/339Beat 97%
↑ 26 days after Shenzhen 2026 2:28 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:34 slower for everyone and the clock still says 1:54 faster: 2:28 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:34 slower This athlete1:54 faster -
Beijing10 Sep 2026Relay · Men51:321/32Beat 97%
-
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Relay · Men52:282/245Beat 99%
-
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:172/254Beat 99%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026, with Donghao Ma 0:48 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:05 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:48 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:05 faster This pair1:17 faster -
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:178/352Beat 98%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026 2:30 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:04 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:26 faster for everyone: 2:30 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:26 faster This athlete0:04 slower -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men56:344/182Beat 98%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:1311/216Beat 95%
-
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Relay · Men53:161/107Beat 99%
-
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:00:547/142Beat 95%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:56138/704Beat 80%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Individual Pro · Men1:08:50416/767Beat 46%
-
Shanghai16 May 2026Relay · Men51:441/162Beat 99%
-
Shanghai16 May 2026Doubles Pro · Men56:364/196Beat 98%
↑ 56 days after Beijing I 2026, with 东昊 马 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:37 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:37 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:37 faster This pair0:37 faster -
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Relay · Men56:432/65Beat 97%
-
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:06:043/134Beat 98%
↑ 112 days after Shenzhen 2025 1:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:40 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:33 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:53 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:33 faster This athlete1:40 faster -
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Relay · Men56:232/107Beat 98%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men54:56 PB2/446Beat 100%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:132/124Beat 98%
-
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:07:4411/285Beat 96%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:063/107Beat 97%
-
Beijing23 Aug 2025Relay · Men1:05:2619/68Beat 72%
-
Beijing23 Aug 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:04:3914/69Beat 80%