Progress against the field
From Beijing I 2026 to Beijing 2026, 爽 郭 and 名达 黄 got 4:40 faster than the field.
The clock says 11:00 faster, but the races themselves got 6:20 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Beijing I 2026 → Chengdu 2026: 6:20 in 133 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:16 PB14/415Beat 97%
↑ 26 days after Shenzhen 2026, with 名达 黄 1:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:12 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:29 faster for everyone, so 1:17 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:29 faster This pair0:12 faster -
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:2823/863Beat 97%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026, with 名达 黄 0:23 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:11 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:34 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:23 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:34 faster This pair2:11 faster -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:3925/528Beat 95%
↑ 133 days after Beijing I 2026, with 名达 黄 6:20 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:37 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:17 faster for everyone, so 6:20 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:17 faster This pair8:37 faster -
Shanghai16 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:21:38 PB125/540Beat 77%
-
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:27:59 PB37/240Beat 85%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:1645/532Beat 92%