Progress against the field
Between Beijing I 2026 and Shenzhen 2026, 研羽 王 and 津 郭 pulled 4:18 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:02 quicker, so 8:20 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The biggest step was Hangzhou 2026 → Chengdu 2026: 3:49 on the field in 28 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 7 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Relay · Women1:31:4922/52Beat 58%
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:21:07 PB82/395Beat 79%
-
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Women1:21:46170/821Beat 79%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026, with 津 郭 0:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:44 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:54 faster for everyone, so 0:10 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:54 faster This pair2:44 faster -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:30159/475Beat 67%
↑ 28 days after Hangzhou 2026, with 津 郭 3:49 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:27 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:38 faster for everyone, so 3:49 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:38 faster This pair4:27 faster -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Doubles Open · Women1:28:57170/411Beat 59%
↑ 105 days after Beijing I 2026, with 津 郭 0:39 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:39 better than the field: 1:09 faster on the clock, against 0:30 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:30 faster This pair1:09 faster -
Shanghai16 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:37:43 PB267/639Beat 58%
-
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:43:47 PB50/51Beat 2%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:30:06221/483Beat 54%