Progress against the field
Between Shenzhen 2025 and Chengdu 2026, 景 王 lost 2:04 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 10:36 quicker, so 8:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Hangzhou 2026 → Chengdu 2026: 26:44 in 28 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 4 events
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:03:35 PB25/182Beat 86%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:0145/882Beat 95%
↑ 28 days after Hangzhou 2026 26:44 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
29:09 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, so 26:44 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete29:09 faster -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Doubles Open · Men1:00:25 PB16/483Beat 97%
-
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Individual Open · Men1:41:10406/760Beat 47%
↑ 49 days after Shanghai 2026 30:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
30:23 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:24 faster for everyone: 30:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:24 faster This athlete30:23 slower -
Shanghai16 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:10:47 PB52/1447Beat 96%
↑ 147 days after Shenzhen 2025 1:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:46 faster on the clock, and the race was 7:47 faster for everyone, so 1:59 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →7:47 faster This athlete9:46 faster -
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:33137/928Beat 85%