Progress against the field
From Beijing I 2026 to Chengdu 2026, the field gained 0:53 on 家羽 盛.
Over the same races everyone got 3:40 quicker, so 2:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 3 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:02:52 PB47/226Beat 79%
↑ 40 days after Chengdu 2026, with 振宾 盛 1:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:25 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:45 faster for everyone, so 1:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:45 faster This pair1:25 faster -
Beijing10 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Men59:24 PB13/287Beat 96%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:04:1726/182Beat 86%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men1:13:10 PB55/882Beat 94%
↑ 133 days after Beijing I 2026 0:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:47 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:40 faster for everyone, so 0:53 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:40 faster This athlete2:47 faster -
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:57131/1267Beat 90%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:4027/446Beat 94%