Progress against the field
Samuel Jones and Andrew Gibb have gained 3:29 on the field from Birmingham 2025 to Birmingham 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 2:14 quicker, so 5:43 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:16292/1035Beat 72%
↑ 374 days after Birmingham 2025, with Andrew Gibb 3:29 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:29 better than the field: 5:43 faster on the clock, against 2:14 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This pair5:43 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:05:23 PB89/1442Beat 94%
-
Sydney1 Jul 2026Individual Open · Men1:32:11766/1122Beat 32%
-
Brisbane9 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:38:52244/257Beat 5%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:09:0753/613Beat 91%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:01:12 PB73/994Beat 93%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · MenDNF—
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:04 PB215/870Beat 75%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:09:59506/1099Beat 54%
-
Brisbane1 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:19:02529/731Beat 28%