Progress against the field
From Brisbane 2025 to Sydney 2026, the field gained 34:58 on Cathal Muldoon and James O'Reilly.
The clock says 29:29 slower, but the races themselves got 5:29 quicker for everyone.
362 days between Sydney 2025 and Sydney 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 33:09 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Sydney1 Jul 2026Doubles Open · Men1:50:09590/598Beat 1%
↑ 362 days after Sydney 2025, with James O'Reilly 33:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
33:09 behind the field: 29:46 slower on the clock, against 3:23 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:23 faster This pair29:46 slower -
Sydney4 Jul 2025Doubles Open · Men1:20:23 PB773/1020Beat 24%
↑ 125 days after Brisbane 2025, with James O'Reilly 1:49 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:06 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:49 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:06 faster This pair0:17 faster -
Brisbane1 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:20:40563/731Beat 23%
-
Sydney27 Jul 2024Doubles Open · Men1:32:22389/415Beat 6%
-
MelbourneDate unknownDoubles Open · Men1:26:27597/737Beat 19%