Progress against the field
From Brisbane 2025 to Brisbane 2026, the field gained 5:24 on Eden Bennett and Rachel Vercoe.
Over the same races everyone got 7:18 quicker, so 1:54 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Sydney1 Jul 2026Doubles Open · Women1:32:54912/1256Beat 27%
-
Brisbane9 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:12106/522Beat 80%
↑ 279 days after Sydney 2025, with Rachel Vercoe 0:37 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:03 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:40 faster for everyone, so 0:37 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:40 faster This pair3:03 faster -
Sydney4 Jul 2025Doubles Open · Women1:19:15125/479Beat 74%
↑ 125 days after Brisbane 2025, with Rachel Vercoe 4:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:47 behind the field: 1:09 slower on the clock, against 3:38 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:38 faster This pair1:09 slower -
Brisbane1 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:06225/1057Beat 79%
-
MelbourneDate unknownDoubles Open · Women1:15:04 PB130/695Beat 81%