Progress against the field
Between Dublin 2025 and Cardiff 2026, Sarah Agnew kept pace with the field.
The races barely moved for everyone else, so 0:30 faster on the clock is close to the whole story.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Jakarta27 Jun 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:54 PB19/1011Beat 98%
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:07:46 PB10/579Beat 98%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:16:41 PB17/253Beat 93%
↑ 168 days after Dublin 2025 0:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:30 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:20 faster for everyone, so 0:10 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete0:30 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:3593/870Beat 89%
↑ 62 days after Rome 2025, with Callum Fearon 3:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:01 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:59 slower for everyone: 3:00 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:59 slower This pair2:01 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:1159/423Beat 86%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:3692/427Beat 79%