Progress against the field
From Utrecht 2025 to Stockholm 2026, the field gained 1:57 on Ellen Lodewyckx and Aline Jacobs.
Over the same races everyone got 1:00 slower, so 2:57 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Pro · Women, with Aline Jacobs, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:10:54391/689Beat 43%
↑ 202 days after Utrecht 2025, with Aline Jacobs 1:57 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:57 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:00 slower for everyone: 1:57 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:00 slower This pair2:57 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:51 PB33/962Beat 97%
↑ 355 days after Belgium 2025, with Tim Van Loo 3:06 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:07 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:13 faster for everyone, so 3:06 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:13 faster This pair1:07 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:28 PB31/1009Beat 97%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:07:57 PB8/102Beat 92%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:5829/722Beat 96%