Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2022 to Birmingham 2025, the field gained 6:59 on Hannah Boyle.
The clock says 6:46 faster, but the races themselves got 13:45 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
20 races · 19 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed55:31 PB5/549Beat 99%
-
Riga30 May 2026Individual Pro · Women1:14:4039/109Beat 64%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:18:5752/144Beat 64%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:2815/1198Beat 99%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:07:407/748Beat 99%
↑ 271 days after Manchester 2025 4:19 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:18 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:01 faster for everyone: 4:19 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:01 faster This athlete2:18 slower -
London3 May 2025Relay · Mixed1:17:5996/137Beat 30%
-
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Pro · Women1:12:14 PB5/41Beat 88%
↑ 49 days after Katowice 2025 1:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:25 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:36 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:25 faster This athlete1:49 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:03:30 PB3/96Beat 97%
-
Katowice22 Feb 2025Individual Pro · Women1:14:0312/77Beat 84%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:05:22 PB4/539Beat 99%
↑ 328 days after Glasgow 2024 0:20 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:42 faster on the clock, and the race was 5:22 faster for everyone, so 0:20 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →5:22 faster This athlete5:42 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed56:521/894Beat 100%
↑ 334 days after London 2023, with Lee Perfect 2:27 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:27 better than the field: 2:40 faster on the clock, against 0:13 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:13 faster This pair2:40 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:11:0420/816Beat 98%
↑ 385 days after Glasgow 2023 0:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:52 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:05 slower for everyone: 0:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:05 slower This athlete0:52 slower -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Mixed59:328/909Beat 99%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Individual Pro · Women1:22:2213/87Beat 85%
-
Malaga15 Apr 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:555/175Beat 97%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Individual Open · Women1:10:1219/442Beat 96%
↑ 119 days after Birmingham 2022 2:13 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 6:27 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:13 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:27 faster This athlete4:14 faster -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Relay · Mixed1:00:231/40Beat 98%
-
Berlin5 Nov 2022Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:116/81Beat 93%
-
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Individual Open · Women1:14:2617/372Beat 95%
-
World Championships ManchesterDate unknownDoubles Open · Mixed1:01:2548/223Beat 79%