Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 0:58 on Meg Billing and Chloe Sherratt.
Over the same races everyone got 2:30 quicker, so 1:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
9 races · 8 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · WomenDNF—
-
Riga30 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:09:14 PB6/377Beat 98%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:06:19 PB39/314Beat 88%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:23 PB62/1887Beat 97%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Chloe Sherratt 0:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:58 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair1:32 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:33:09 PB1236/1474Beat 16%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Women1:21:35 PB42/119Beat 65%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:5547/1111Beat 96%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:15:2563/587Beat 89%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Individual Open · Women1:19:0281/765Beat 89%