Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2026 and London Olympia 2026, Jonathan Davies lost 2:08 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:39 quicker, so 2:31 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
22 races · 14 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:45230/1035Beat 78%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Rhidian Daniels 9:16 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:52 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:36 faster for everyone, so 9:16 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This pair10:52 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:58 PB152/560Beat 73%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men2:03:28311/312Beat 0%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:06:04160/605Beat 74%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:1181/600Beat 87%
-
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:06:29 PB56/112Beat 50%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Men58:3310/233Beat 96%
-
Helsinki9 May 2026Doubles Open · Men58:2317/431Beat 96%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men59:2814/271Beat 95%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Matthew Stringfellow 1:16 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:34 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:18 faster for everyone, so 1:16 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:18 faster This pair1:34 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:13:37234/430Beat 46%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:01:1782/813Beat 90%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:39 PB138/642Beat 79%
↑ 13 days after Glasgow 2026 2:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:04 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:14 faster for everyone, so 2:10 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This athlete0:04 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:43357/1452Beat 75%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 0:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:27 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:25 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete2:27 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:17:10494/1463Beat 66%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:00:5534/563Beat 94%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:28897/1474Beat 39%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:01:02211/1815Beat 88%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Matthew Stringfellow 1:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:54 better than the field: 3:45 faster on the clock, against 1:51 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair3:45 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:47263/1177Beat 78%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men58:16 PB63/1099Beat 94%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:34201/267Beat 25%
↑ 79 days after Glasgow 2025, with Chloe Goodwin 0:56 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:38 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:56 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair0:38 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:12614/841Beat 27%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:04:3293/444Beat 79%