Progress against the field
From Johannesburg I 2025 to Johannesburg 2026, Juliet Hill and Katelynn Hill got 3:45 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 11:52 quicker, so 15:37 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 182 days between Johannesburg 2025 and Johannesburg 2026, still ended 1:14 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Johannesburg30 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:58:18 PB787/1061Beat 26%
↑ 182 days after Johannesburg 2025, with Katelynn Hill 1:14 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:14 better than the field: 8:18 faster on the clock, against 7:04 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →7:04 faster This pair8:18 faster -
Johannesburg29 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women2:06:36604/714Beat 15%
↑ 133 days after Cape Town 2025, with Katelynn Hill 5:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:20 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:44 slower for everyone: 5:36 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:44 slower This pair7:20 slower -
Cape Town19 Jul 2025Doubles Open · Women1:59:16637/723Beat 12%
↑ 140 days after Johannesburg I 2025, with Katelynn Hill 8:07 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
14:39 faster on the clock, and the race was 6:32 faster for everyone, so 8:07 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →6:32 faster This pair14:39 faster -
Johannesburg I1 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women2:13:55525/547Beat 4%