Progress against the field
From Turin 2026 to Barcelona 2026, the field gained 4:46 on Tomaž Gojčič.
The clock says 0:52 slower, but the races themselves got 3:54 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
19 races · 12 events
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Men53:42 PB2/1014Beat 100%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:05:12 PB41/362Beat 89%
↑ 118 days after Rimini 2026 8:15 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:15 better than the field: 10:33 faster on the clock, against 2:18 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:18 faster This athlete10:33 faster -
Rimini28 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:04:4622/1482Beat 99%
-
Rimini28 May 2026Individual Pro · Men1:15:4576/371Beat 80%
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:489/549Beat 98%
↑ 40 days after Bologna 2026 2:32 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:22 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:10 faster for everyone: 2:32 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:10 faster This athlete2:22 slower -
Bologna4 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:44 PB37/860Beat 96%
-
Bologna4 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men59:26 PB2/799Beat 100%
↑ 64 days after Turin 2026 2:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:30 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:44 faster for everyone, so 2:14 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:44 faster This athlete1:30 faster -
Turin30 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men54:066/1060Beat 99%
-
Turin30 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:00:5613/1511Beat 99%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:2549/1474Beat 97%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:09:33153/467Beat 67%
-
Stuttgart31 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:44 PB23/388Beat 94%
-
Stuttgart31 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:08:4879/1171Beat 93%
↑ 42 days after Maastricht 2025 9:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:02 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:05 faster for everyone: 9:07 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:05 faster This athlete5:02 slower -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:4614/1352Beat 99%
-
Rimini30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men59:1428/693Beat 96%
-
Rimini30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:3522/1225Beat 98%
↑ 48 days after Warsaw 2025 1:25 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:13 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:48 faster for everyone, so 1:25 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:48 faster This athlete3:13 faster -
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:06:4868/768Beat 91%
↑ 49 days after Vienna 2025 2:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:48 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:19 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This athlete0:29 faster -
Vienna22 Feb 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:17233/1356Beat 83%
-
BudapestDate unknownIndividual Pro · Men1:05:5348/210Beat 77%