Progress against the field
Between Las Vegas 2026 and New York 2026, Stephanie Noll pulled 0:25 ahead of the field.
The clock says 1:10 slower, but the races themselves got 1:35 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Boston8 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:22:46 PB149/426Beat 65%
↑ 377 days after Boston 2025, with Christina Noll 1:24 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:44 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:08 faster for everyone, so 1:24 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:08 faster This pair0:44 faster -
New York28 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:22:5746/295Beat 84%
↑ 97 days after Las Vegas 2026 0:25 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:10 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:35 slower for everyone: 0:25 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 slower This athlete1:10 slower -
Las Vegas20 Feb 2026Individual Open · Women1:21:47 PB243/1796Beat 87%
-
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:30508/1424Beat 64%
-
New York30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:24:53152/417Beat 64%