Progress against the field
Leanne Eggimann has dropped 2:28 behind the field from New York 2026 to Boston 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 3:55 quicker, so 1:27 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Boston8 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:34:30 PB260/722Beat 64%
↑ 133 days after New York 2026 2:28 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:27 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:55 faster for everyone, so 2:28 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:55 faster This athlete1:27 faster -
New York28 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:35:57131/295Beat 56%
-
Phoenix29 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed3:13:111057/1059Beat 0%
↑ 125 days after Boston 2025, with Dan Eggimann 1:54:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:52:36 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:24 faster for everyone: 1:54:00 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 faster This pair1:52:36 slower -
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:35 PB518/1259Beat 59%
-
Washington D.C. Open North American ChampionshipsDate unknownDoubles Open · Mixed1:20:55320/761Beat 58%