Progress against the field
From Boston 2025 to Phoenix 2026, the field gained 2:15 on Barton Erwin and Erin Erwin.
Over the same races everyone got 1:38 quicker, so 0:37 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Salt Lake City19 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:40:42 PB277/349Beat 21%
-
New York28 May 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:19:32 PB298/409Beat 27%
-
Las Vegas20 Feb 2026Individual Open · Men1:31:27 PB838/1739Beat 52%
-
Phoenix29 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:30:17696/1059Beat 34%
↑ 76 days after Chicago 2025, with Erin Erwin 2:31 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:20 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:11 faster for everyone: 2:31 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:11 faster This pair0:20 slower -
Chicago14 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:29:57793/1179Beat 33%
↑ 49 days after Boston 2025, with Erin Erwin 0:16 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 slower on the clock, but the race was 0:33 slower for everyone, so this was 0:16 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:33 slower This pair0:17 slower -
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:29:40 PB873/1259Beat 31%
-
Washington D.C. Open North American ChampionshipsDate unknownIndividual Open · Men1:38:401090/1544Beat 29%