Progress against the field
Between New York 2025 and Dallas 2025, Sarah Sauber pulled 2:16 ahead of the field.
The clock says 7:06 faster, but the races themselves got 4:50 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from New York 2025 → Boston 2025: 9:06 in 119 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Boston8 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:17:5492/691Beat 87%
↑ 377 days after Boston 2025, with Sienna Frank 7:02 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:54 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:08 faster for everyone: 7:02 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:08 faster This pair4:54 slower -
New York28 May 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:13:15 PB79/333Beat 76%
-
Dallas21 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:20:42205/1494Beat 86%
↑ 56 days after Boston 2025 6:50 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:50 behind the field: 4:21 slower on the clock, against 2:29 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:29 faster This athlete4:21 slower -
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:00 PB108/1424Beat 92%
-
Boston26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:16:21 PB91/1290Beat 93%
↑ 119 days after New York 2025 9:06 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:27 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:21 faster for everyone, so 9:06 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:21 faster This athlete11:27 faster -
New York30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:27:48120/450Beat 73%