Progress against the field
Between Boston 2025 and Dallas 2025, Emma Flanagan and Andrew Newcomb lost 2:48 to the field.
The races themselves barely changed, so 2:24 slower on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 3 events
-
New York28 May 2026Relay · Women1:33:3683/155Beat 47%
-
New York28 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:37:44 PB602/1048Beat 43%
-
New York28 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:54 PB27/508Beat 95%
-
Dallas21 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:41:451240/1504Beat 18%
↑ 56 days after Boston 2025, with Andrew Newcomb 2:48 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:24 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:24 faster for everyone: 2:48 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:24 faster This pair2:24 slower -
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:39:211096/1259Beat 13%