Progress against the field
From New York 2024 to New York 2026, the field gained 3:51 on Mark Sharfshteyn and Anthony Miloslavsky.
Over the same races everyone got 0:32 slower, so 4:23 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
3 races · 3 events
-
New York28 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:20:52189/425Beat 56%
↑ 363 days after New York 2025, with Anthony Miloslavsky 2:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:16 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:18 slower for everyone: 2:58 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 slower This pair4:16 slower -
New York30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:16:36417/777Beat 46%
↑ 363 days after New York 2024, with Anthony Miloslavsky 0:53 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:07 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:46 faster for everyone: 0:53 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:46 faster This pair0:07 slower -
New York1 Jun 2024Doubles Open · Men1:16:29 PB187/308Beat 39%