Progress against the field
From New York 2025 to New York 2026, the field gained 3:48 on Greg Langer and Justine Mack.
Over the same races everyone got 3:17 quicker, so 0:31 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
244 days between Boston 2025 and New York 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:20 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
New York28 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:30261/1034Beat 75%
↑ 244 days after Boston 2025, with Justine Mack 2:20 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:20 better than the field: 2:47 faster on the clock, against 0:27 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:27 faster This pair2:47 faster -
Phoenix29 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:17:24 PB183/372Beat 51%
-
Boston26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:25:17713/1259Beat 43%
↑ 119 days after New York 2025, with Justine Mack 6:08 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:18 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:50 faster for everyone: 6:08 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:50 faster This pair3:18 slower -
New York30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:59 PB372/709Beat 48%