Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 4:28 on Cameron Morgan and Craig Steele.
Over the same races everyone got 1:21 quicker, so 3:07 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Men, with Craig Steele, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
13 races · 13 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:09:33138/312Beat 56%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:33:00183/277Beat 34%
↑ 36 days after Malaga 2026 8:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:09 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:03 slower for everyone: 8:06 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:03 slower This athlete10:09 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:17173/419Beat 59%
↑ 36 days after London Olympia 2026, with Victoria Morgan 1:52 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:58 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:06 slower for everyone: 1:52 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:06 slower This pair1:58 slower -
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:22:51 PB275/561Beat 51%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:19 PB308/887Beat 65%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025, with Victoria Morgan 2:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:33 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:09 faster for everyone, so 2:24 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:09 faster This pair5:33 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:11:41157/404Beat 61%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Craig Steele 1:05 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:20 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:15 slower for everyone: 1:05 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:15 slower This pair2:20 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:09:21897/2102Beat 57%
↑ 22 days after Dublin 2025, with Craig Steele 2:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:04 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:54 faster for everyone: 2:58 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:54 faster This pair2:04 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:17 PB219/777Beat 72%
↑ 166 days after Cardiff 2025, with Craig Steele 0:25 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:42 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:25 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:42 faster This pair1:17 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:52455/889Beat 49%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:08:34107/269Beat 60%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:12:34585/1105Beat 47%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:09196/494Beat 60%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024, with Shaun Healy 0:05 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:31 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:26 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →2:26 faster This pair2:31 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:40390/850Beat 54%