Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Berlin 2026, Megan Chard lost 9:20 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:11 slower, so 10:31 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
The biggest step was Manchester 2026 → EMEA London Olympia 2026: 12:53 on the field in 62 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 7 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:40:22158/230Beat 31%
↑ 59 days after EMEA London Olympia 2026 10:52 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:52 behind the field: 14:26 slower on the clock, against 3:34 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:34 slower This athlete14:26 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:15:18 PB76/488Beat 84%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:06:2510/24Beat 58%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:25:56 PB321/507Beat 37%
↑ 62 days after Manchester 2026 12:53 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
12:53 better than the field: 15:42 faster on the clock, against 2:49 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:49 faster This athlete15:42 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:41:38165/268Beat 38%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 11:21 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:47 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:26 slower for everyone: 11:21 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:26 slower This athlete11:47 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:29:51780/1542Beat 49%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:21:20 PB53/92Beat 42%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:06231/713Beat 68%