Progress against the field
From Manchester 2024 to London Excel 2025, Chris Scotney and Martin Tranter got 0:18 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 6:45 quicker, so 7:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Manchester 2024 → London 2025: 3:05 in 175 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:23 PB108/993Beat 89%
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:4877/349Beat 78%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:02:34288/1815Beat 84%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Martin Tranter 2:10 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:10 behind the field: 0:19 slower on the clock, against 1:51 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair0:19 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:02:15 PB29/189Beat 85%
↑ 172 days after London 2025, with Martin Tranter 0:37 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:21 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:58 faster for everyone, so 0:37 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:58 faster This pair1:21 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:36198/1010Beat 80%
↑ 175 days after Manchester 2024, with Martin Tranter 3:05 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:01 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:56 faster for everyone, so 3:05 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:56 faster This pair6:01 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:09:37326/719Beat 55%