Progress against the field
Harry Doorley has gained 4:40 on the field from Malaga 2025 to Berlin 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 5:14 quicker, so 9:54 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Malaga 2025 → Berlin 2025: 5:24 in 56 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
12 races · 10 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:4922/686Beat 97%
↑ 36 days after Malaga 2026 0:23 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:26 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:03 slower for everyone: 0:23 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:03 slower This athlete2:26 slower -
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:23 PB10/474Beat 98%
↑ 23 days after EMEA London Olympia 2026 0:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:17 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:14 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:17 faster This athlete1:03 faster -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:02:26176/958Beat 82%
↑ 62 days after Amsterdam 2026 1:01 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:32 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:31 faster for everyone, so 1:01 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:31 faster This athlete1:32 faster -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:31 PB43/506Beat 92%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:5850/1620Beat 97%
↑ 70 days after Dublin 2025 2:22 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:22 behind the field: 0:45 slower on the clock, against 1:37 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This athlete0:45 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men58:35102/2102Beat 95%
↑ 22 days after Dublin 2025, with Mark Giles 1:38 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:44 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:54 faster for everyone: 1:38 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:54 faster This pair0:44 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men57:51 PB29/667Beat 96%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:1341/955Beat 96%
↑ 26 days after Valencia 2025 2:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:00 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:26 faster for everyone, so 2:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:26 faster This athlete2:00 faster -
Valencia17 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:1337/1018Beat 96%
↑ 154 days after Berlin 2025 3:40 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:14 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:54 slower for everyone: 3:40 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →3:54 slower This athlete0:14 slower -
Berlin16 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:5986/748Beat 89%
↑ 56 days after Malaga 2025 5:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:24 better than the field: 8:44 faster on the clock, against 3:20 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:20 faster This athlete8:44 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:13:43265/966Beat 73%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Men1:18:42265/343Beat 23%