Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025, Louise Cullen and Rebecca Lawrie lost 1:13 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:32 quicker, so 2:19 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:28:06 PB116/151Beat 23%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:32:41984/1618Beat 39%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:10 PB205/460Beat 55%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:33 PB744/1887Beat 61%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025, with Rebecca Lawrie 1:13 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:19 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:32 faster for everyone, so 1:13 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:32 faster This pair2:19 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:52399/1051Beat 62%