Progress against the field
Between Riga 2025 and Dublin 2025, Kate O’Donnell pulled 0:43 ahead of the field.
The clock says 9:56 faster, but the races themselves got 9:13 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Oslo 2025 → Dublin 2025: 3:09 in 47 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Houston26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:59 PB49/548Beat 91%
-
Gent12 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:55:17851/882Beat 4%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:25:30 PB224/539Beat 58%
↑ 47 days after Oslo 2025 3:09 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:09 better than the field: 7:28 faster on the clock, against 4:19 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:19 faster This athlete7:28 faster -
Oslo26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:32:58230/450Beat 49%
↑ 118 days after Riga 2025 2:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:28 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:54 faster for everyone, so 2:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:54 faster This athlete2:28 faster -
Riga31 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:35:26179/291Beat 39%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:18:27262/973Beat 73%