Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Birmingham 2026, Michael Feeney and Rhondda Feeney have moved with the field: what changed on the clock changed for everyone.
Over the same races everyone got 11:51 quicker, so 11:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Birmingham 2024 → London 2024: 11:31 in 35 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:32:14426/560Beat 24%
↑ 162 days after Berlin 2026, with Rhondda Feeney 1:01 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:01 better than the field: 2:02 faster on the clock, against 1:01 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:01 faster This pair2:02 faster -
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:34:16465/577Beat 19%
↑ 72 days after Glasgow 2026, with Rhondda Feeney 0:30 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:30 behind the field: 0:37 slower on the clock, against 0:07 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:07 slower This pair0:37 slower -
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:36:55 PB761/816Beat 7%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:33:39938/1198Beat 22%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Rhondda Feeney 3:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:54 better than the field: 6:19 faster on the clock, against 2:25 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This pair6:19 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:39:58259/297Beat 13%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025, with Rhondda Feeney 6:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:34 behind the field: 5:33 slower on the clock, against 1:01 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:01 faster This pair5:33 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:34:25819/954Beat 14%
↑ 159 days after Berlin 2025, with Rhondda Feeney 4:41 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:29 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:48 slower for everyone: 4:41 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:48 slower This pair5:29 slower -
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:56 PB460/528Beat 13%
↑ 65 days after Glasgow 2025, with Rhondda Feeney 3:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:50 faster for everyone, which leaves this 3:33 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:50 faster This pair1:17 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:30:13651/861Beat 24%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Rhondda Feeney 1:02 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:27 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:29 faster for everyone, so 1:02 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:29 faster This pair1:27 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:31:40648/795Beat 19%
↑ 35 days after Birmingham 2024, with Rhondda Feeney 11:31 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
12:31 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:00 faster for everyone, so 11:31 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:00 faster This pair12:31 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:44:11446/494Beat 10%