Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2025 to Manchester 2026, Kim Lane got 2:39 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:35 quicker, so 4:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:23:41 PB141/280Beat 50%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:5050/847Beat 94%
↑ 169 days after London Excel 2025, with Ellen Hope 0:46 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:01 slower on the clock, but the race was 0:47 slower for everyone, so this was 0:46 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:47 slower This pair0:01 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:14:01140/867Beat 84%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:26:02 PB264/825Beat 68%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 2:39 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:39 better than the field: 4:14 faster on the clock, against 1:35 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 faster This athlete4:14 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:49 PB232/1599Beat 86%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:30:16293/748Beat 61%