Progress against the field
Scott Keegan has dropped 0:19 behind the field from Malaga 2025 to Rome 2025.
The races themselves barely changed, so 0:10 faster on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:12:47136/308Beat 56%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:29504/1029Beat 51%
↑ 15 days after Dublin 2025, with Alan Doolan 3:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:06 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:07 slower for everyone: 3:59 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:07 slower This pair6:06 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:23 PB217/667Beat 68%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:42:58 PB1199/1367Beat 12%
↑ 189 days after Malaga 2025 0:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:10 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:29 faster for everyone, so 0:19 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:29 faster This athlete0:10 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:43:08894/966Beat 8%