Progress against the field
From Rome 2026 to Geneva 2026, the field gained 5:06 on Cédric Rognon.
Over the same races everyone got 2:00 quicker, so 3:06 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:51:391275/1414Beat 10%
↑ 16 days after Rome 2026 5:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:06 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:00 faster for everyone: 5:06 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:00 faster This athlete3:06 slower -
Rome23 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men1:48:33 PB948/1062Beat 11%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:18:30 PB466/699Beat 33%
↑ 126 days after St. Gallen 2026, with Samuel Dieffenbacher 1:35 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:16 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:51 faster for everyone, so 1:35 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:51 faster This pair2:16 faster -
St. Gallen16 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:20:46409/654Beat 38%
-
St. Gallen16 Jan 2026Relay · Men1:12:0215/21Beat 29%