Progress against the field
Jill Magee and Gemma McCutcheon have dropped 2:29 behind the field from Berlin 2026 to Birmingham 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 1:09 quicker, so 1:20 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Gemma McCutcheon, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
15 races · 15 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:07:2050/1246Beat 96%
↑ 162 days after Berlin 2026, with Gemma McCutcheon 2:29 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:29 behind the field: 1:20 slower on the clock, against 1:09 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:09 faster This pair1:20 slower -
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:06:0010/777Beat 99%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:04:05 PB9/715Beat 99%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:04:1928/220Beat 87%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:07:0914/1618Beat 99%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Gemma McCutcheon 2:56 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:56 behind the field: 0:47 slower on the clock, against 2:09 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair0:47 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:06:225/198Beat 98%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Gemma McCutcheon 1:14 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:14 behind the field: 2:16 slower on the clock, against 1:02 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:02 slower This pair2:16 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:04:0610/1599Beat 99%
↑ 7 days after Madrid 2025, with Gemma McCutcheon 1:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:09 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:23 faster for everyone, so 1:14 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:23 faster This pair3:09 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:158/721Beat 99%
↑ 15 days after Dublin 2025, with Gemma McCutcheon 1:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:46 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:18 slower for everyone: 1:28 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 slower This pair2:46 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:04:296/525Beat 99%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2025, with Gemma McCutcheon 1:01 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:37 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:38 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:01 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:38 faster This pair1:37 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:0616/1111Beat 99%
-
Hong Kong26 Jul 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:362/584Beat 100%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:318/247Beat 97%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:10:5531/713Beat 96%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:18:01 PB125/830Beat 85%
-
Vienna22 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:42106/595Beat 82%