Progress against the field
Between Guadalajara 2025 and Puebla 2026, ANA CEPEDA and MOCTEZUMA CEPEDA lost 29:08 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:38 quicker, so 26:30 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
252 days between Acapulco 2025 and Puebla 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 15:24 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Puebla16 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:58:10812/942Beat 14%
↑ 252 days after Acapulco 2025, with MOCTEZUMA CEPEDA 15:24 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
20:50 slower on the clock in a race that was 5:26 slower for everyone: 15:24 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:26 slower This pair20:50 slower -
Acapulco6 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:37:20399/543Beat 27%
↑ 154 days after Monterrey 2025, with MOCTEZUMA CEPEDA 11:33 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:45 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:48 faster for everyone: 11:33 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:48 faster This pair9:45 slower -
Monterrey5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:35 PB201/388Beat 48%
↑ 56 days after Guadalajara 2025, with MOCTEZUMA CEPEDA 2:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:05 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:16 faster for everyone, so 2:11 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:16 faster This pair4:05 faster -
Guadalajara8 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:31:40148/245Beat 40%
-
Ciudad de Mexico9 Nov 2024Relay · Mixed1:27:0933/50Beat 34%