Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to Manchester 2026, Emily Jones got 12:59 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:29 quicker, so 15:28 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
9 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:35:18 PB418/585Beat 29%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025, with Gemma Kingdon 0:55 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:55 better than the field: 2:38 faster on the clock, against 1:43 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:43 faster This pair2:38 faster -
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:33:58398/477Beat 17%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:45 PB257/887Beat 71%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:48:56 PB203/268Beat 24%
↑ 362 days after Manchester 2025 12:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
15:28 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:29 faster for everyone, so 12:59 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:29 faster This athlete15:28 faster -
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:14627/1002Beat 37%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:37:561335/1599Beat 17%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women2:04:001100/1111Beat 1%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women2:04:24513/539Beat 5%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:48:08645/698Beat 8%