Progress against the field
Between Rotterdam 2026 and Heerenveen 2026, Fleur van Oijen and Babette Weeda lost 2:02 to the field.
The clock says 1:12 faster, but the races themselves got 3:14 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Babette Weeda, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:01100/513Beat 81%
↑ 29 days after Rotterdam 2026, with Babette Weeda 2:02 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:12 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:14 faster for everyone, so 2:02 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:14 faster This pair1:12 faster -
Heerenveen14 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:17:25 PB43/608Beat 93%
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:17:13181/936Beat 81%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:52 PB142/693Beat 80%
-
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:07 PB50/633Beat 92%
↑ 140 days after Amsterdam 2024, with Bobbi Bartens 0:08 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:46 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:38 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →3:38 faster This pair3:46 faster -
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:18:53126/657Beat 81%