Progress against the field
May-Britt Verhoef and Eva ter Haar have dropped 1:57 behind the field from Utrecht 2025 to Heerenveen 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 4:44 quicker, so 2:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Utrecht 2025 → Mechelen 2026: 4:09 in 118 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 6 events
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:06:03 PB10/737Beat 99%
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:4549/513Beat 90%
↑ 49 days after Mechelen 2026, with Eva ter Haar 6:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:52 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:14 faster for everyone: 6:06 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:14 faster This pair4:52 slower -
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:16:21 PB12/485Beat 98%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed1:05:049/67Beat 87%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:07:5313/285Beat 95%
↑ 118 days after Utrecht 2025, with Eva ter Haar 4:09 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:39 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:30 faster for everyone, so 4:09 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:30 faster This pair7:39 faster -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:13:15 PB9/31Beat 71%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:3282/828Beat 90%
-
Paris22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:24:1655/96Beat 43%