Progress against the field
Between Amsterdam 2026 and Maastricht 2026, Vera De graaf and Daniëlle Verweij lost 2:01 to the field.
The races themselves barely changed, so 1:37 slower on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Daniëlle Verweij, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:17:3795/708Beat 87%
↑ 128 days after Heerenveen 2026, with Daniëlle Verweij 1:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:51 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:07 slower for everyone: 1:44 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:07 slower This pair3:51 slower -
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:46 PB73/737Beat 90%
↑ 113 days after Amsterdam 2026, with Daniëlle Verweij 0:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:31 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:17 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 faster This pair2:14 faster -
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:17:45196/936Beat 79%
↑ 208 days after Maastricht 2025, with Maud de Laat 6:16 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:16 better than the field: 10:17 faster on the clock, against 4:01 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:01 faster This pair10:17 faster -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:00178/1030Beat 83%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:28:02435/739Beat 41%