Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Glasgow 2026, Connor Laughton lost 0:58 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:27 quicker, so 1:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Men1:04:1928/79Beat 65%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:24 PB230/1051Beat 78%
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:47 PB82/564Beat 86%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:28:23 PB875/1452Beat 40%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025 0:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:29 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:27 faster for everyone, so 0:58 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:27 faster This athlete1:29 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:29:521159/1821Beat 36%