Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Natalie Wright lost 3:29 to the field.
The clock says 1:52 slower, but the races themselves got 1:37 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:33:08287/552Beat 48%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 3:29 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:29 behind the field: 1:52 slower on the clock, against 1:37 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This athlete1:52 slower -
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:25:41 PB301/428Beat 30%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:19:39 PB57/279Beat 80%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Kerry Davies 0:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:33 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 0:50 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:17 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:50 faster This pair0:33 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:20:59 PB18/30Beat 40%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:31:16 PB837/1542Beat 46%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:20190/267Beat 29%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:12318/1051Beat 70%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:35:1281/96Beat 16%