Progress against the field
From Maastricht 2025 to Gent 2025, the field gained 4:36 on Amélie Scara.
Over the same races everyone got 4:15 quicker, so 0:21 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:09:51 PB35/949Beat 96%
-
Paris GP23 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:3517/273Beat 94%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:10 PB111/394Beat 72%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:00117/496Beat 76%
↑ 91 days after Paris 2025, with Romain Cothenet 4:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:50 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:26 faster for everyone, so 4:36 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:26 faster This pair1:50 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:23:04218/1009Beat 78%
↑ 84 days after Maastricht 2025 4:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:21 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:15 faster for everyone: 4:36 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:15 faster This athlete0:21 slower -
Paris22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:50103/640Beat 84%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:43 PB109/590Beat 82%