Progress against the field
From London 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 1:24 on Annabel McKee.
The clock says 2:03 faster, but the races themselves got 3:27 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Hong Kong8 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed58:14 PB3/1174Beat 100%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:04:12 PB13/1155Beat 99%
↑ 306 days after Malaga 2025, with Ffion Vickers 2:51 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:37 slower for everyone: 2:51 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:37 slower This pair2:14 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:31 PB87/1542Beat 94%
↑ 215 days after London 2025 1:24 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:03 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:27 faster for everyone, so 1:24 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:27 faster This athlete2:03 faster -
Paris22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed58:312/640Beat 100%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:34119/1368Beat 91%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:267/264Beat 97%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed59:445/861Beat 99%