Progress against the field
Jessica Read has dropped 7:19 behind the field from London Excel 2025 to Cardiff 2026.
The clock says 4:14 slower, but the races themselves got 3:05 quicker for everyone.
The biggest step was London Excel 2025 → Manchester 2026: 11:15 on the field in 48 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
9 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women2:37:07 PB280/280Beat 0%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women2:15:35 PB—Beat 1%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women2:34:08384/389Beat 1%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026 18:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
15:03 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:31 faster for everyone: 18:34 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:31 faster This athlete15:03 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women2:53:51314/314Beat 0%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women2:19:05 PB245/263Beat 7%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 11:15 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:49 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:26 slower for everyone: 11:15 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:26 slower This athlete10:49 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women2:29:541530/1542Beat 1%
-
Paris22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women2:29:32545/552Beat 1%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Pro · Women1:18:14 PB27/55Beat 51%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women2:44:11844/846Beat 0%