Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Cardiff 2026, Danielle Green got 2:39 faster than the field.
The clock says 4:31 faster, but the races themselves got 1:52 quicker for everyone.
The biggest step was London Excel 2025 → Glasgow 2026: 3:01 on the field in 97 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:24:31 PB97/400Beat 76%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026 0:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:10 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:32 faster for everyone, so 0:22 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:32 faster This athlete1:10 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:25:41268/1084Beat 75%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025 3:01 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:21 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:20 faster for everyone, so 3:01 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete3:21 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:23 PB356/824Beat 57%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:29:02542/1379Beat 61%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:47:20 PB900/973Beat 8%